Comments on: Shopocracy http://bryanwiens.wordpress.com/2006/10/05/shopocracy/ Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:03:12 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: bryanwiens http://bryanwiens.wordpress.com/2006/10/05/shopocracy/#comment-750 bryanwiens Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:04:51 +0000 http://bryanwiens.wordpress.com/2006/10/05/shopocracy/#comment-750 Hi Ryan, I am afraid I do not spend time debating in chat groups. So, thanks for the invite but I won't be joining you or Tony. As for this blog entry, I would ask you to reread. My point here was to bring light to the trend of courts setting legislation rather than interpreting the law as written. Bryan Hi Ryan,
I am afraid I do not spend time debating in chat groups. So, thanks for the invite but I won’t be joining you or Tony.

As for this blog entry, I would ask you to reread. My point here was to bring light to the trend of courts setting legislation rather than interpreting the law as written.

Bryan

]]> By: Ryan O'Neil Seaton http://bryanwiens.wordpress.com/2006/10/05/shopocracy/#comment-749 Ryan O'Neil Seaton Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:30:49 +0000 http://bryanwiens.wordpress.com/2006/10/05/shopocracy/#comment-749 Good for Nova Scotia. Long live freedom of choice. http://groups.to/liberty I challenge you to share your views in my facebook group Bryan. You're welcome to share them as its comprised of people of differing views on this issue worldwide. Good for Nova Scotia. Long live freedom of choice.

http://groups.to/liberty

I challenge you to share your views in my facebook group Bryan.

You’re welcome to share them as its comprised of people of differing views on this issue worldwide.

]]> By: Bryan http://bryanwiens.wordpress.com/2006/10/05/shopocracy/#comment-225 Bryan Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:34:52 +0000 http://bryanwiens.wordpress.com/2006/10/05/shopocracy/#comment-225 Hey Kendra, thanks for leaving a comment!<br/><br/><br/>I knew that was the position of the NS Supreme Court. However, much as with the US court decision Roe vs. Wade where the Justice indicated that the decision to allow an abortion was specific to the circumstance (sexual assault), the decisions handed down by the courts bear larger consequences than they will admit or take responsiblity for.<br/><br/>In this case, my take is that Premier MacDonald used this decision as a cop-out, a scape goat for a decision he wanted to implement but knew he couldn't. Between the Supreme Court and the NS Government, the results of the vote should have been honoured. Hey Kendra, thanks for leaving a comment!

I knew that was the position of the NS Supreme Court. However, much as with the US court decision Roe vs. Wade where the Justice indicated that the decision to allow an abortion was specific to the circumstance (sexual assault), the decisions handed down by the courts bear larger consequences than they will admit or take responsiblity for.

In this case, my take is that Premier MacDonald used this decision as a cop-out, a scape goat for a decision he wanted to implement but knew he couldn’t. Between the Supreme Court and the NS Government, the results of the vote should have been honoured.

]]>